I am currently working on a long articles on different models. Since I don't find the inspiration in those dire times, I forced myself into writing a press review.
Before reading this article, I was reluctant to add retries in a distributed system. Retry storm is a way of DDoS yourself. Plus, retries don't usually help solving the issue that the first request ran into.
I might now consider retries with two conditions: exponential backoff and jittering.
The law of fluency is really nice:
“Well”-adapted work occurs with a facility that belies the difficulty of the demands resolved and the dilemmas balanced.
This quote inspires me a myriad of unorganized thoughts, it would be egoistic to keep it for me. The facility of a presentation on story mapping during an hour belies the dozen of hours not meeting expectations with a reluctant client...
The more I think of models, the more I regret the lack of visual aids when designing software. Python tutor is nice for language that do not have a nice debugger. For Java I'll still use my IDE debugger.
I am still in quest of an even more powerful tool to develop visually, but I can't find any that seem accessible.
I disagree with this article, but I think it's interesting to talk on this subject.
Secondly, the fact that you decide to use a client-server architecture makes the communication between them an essential part of the system.
Finally, if you put your server in charge of the core of your application, then I find natural to have a communication as a separate component. I agree with the conclusion of the article: you have to separate your API objects (to treat retro-compatibility, etc.) and your domain objects. The way it arrives there is not my favorite.